Alaska Public Media © 2024. All rights reserved.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Federal judge offers split decision in Elim-Unalakleet lawsuit over tribal consent

The village of Elim in June 2024.
Ben Townsend
/
KNOM
The village of Elim in June 2024.

A broadband internet project in Elim and Unalakleet will move forward after a federal judge's decision in a lawsuit challenging its funding, setting an important precedent for future cases involving tribal consent.

In 2023 the U.S. Department of Agriculture issued roughly $70 million in grant funding to bring high-speed fiber internet access to western Alaska.

There was just one major problem.

Two companies, Mukluk Telephone Company, Inc. and Interior Telephone Company, collectively working under Fastwyre Broadband, planned projects in Elim and Unalakleet.

With the projects taking place on tribal land, per the USDA’s own rules, they were required to obtain tribal consent. According to a joint lawsuit filed by Elim and Unalakleet, the companies sidestepped this requirement, instead relying on support from the Nome-based tribal consortium, Kawerak, Inc.

Court documents reveal it was Kawerak itself that raised concerns last year that their support was not a sufficient substitute for tribal consent. In response, the USDA wrote they “cannot simply undo legal contracts for federal funding which it believed were properly supported and entered into.”

In May Elim and Unalakleet filed a lawsuit against the USDA’s Rural Utility Service. The suit sought to cancel the awards issued to the telecommunications companies and restore the villages’ ability to apply for future broadband funding.

A Tuesday ruling issued by Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge Matthew Scoble denied the villages’ request to cancel the awards. But the judge did rule that the department and telecommunications companies “should have obtained tribal consent and that failure to do so is a cognizable injury.”

An attorney representing Elim and Unalakleet called the ruling “a huge vindication of Tribal sovereign rights,” in an email to KNOM.