Representative, lobbyist argue whether ending tax credits is a money grab

Lawmakers say cutting tax credits to oil and gas companies may be a necessary step to close the state government’s budget deficit.

Download Audio

After testifying herself, Kara Moriarty, President and CEO of the Oil and Gas Association (AOGA), tracks the testimony of other oil and gas executives in a House Resources Committee meeting Feb. 29, 2016. The committee was taking testimony on House Bill 247 that would, among other things, make changes to the way oil and gas companies are taxed (Photo by Skip Gray, 360 North)
After testifying herself, Kara Moriarty, President and CEO of the Oil and Gas Association (AOGA), tracks the testimony of other oil and gas executives in a House Resources Committee meeting Feb. 29, 2016. (File photo by Skip Gray, 360 North)

But Alaska Oil and Gas Association President and CEO Kara Moriarty says the House Rule’s Committee substitute bill – known as a “C.S.” – would be disastrous.

“We see the CS as a money grab that will without question lead to less oil production, less investment, fewer Alaskans working, and ultimately – and somewhat ironically – less revenue for the state,” Moriarty said.

Moriarty spoke during a committee hearing Wednesday on the bill. Sitka Democratic Representative Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins challenged Moriarty, saying that reducing subsidies isn’t a money grab.

“It would seem to me that the money is Alaska’s money – and it’s going to you – and not the other way around,” Moriarty said.

Moriarty says the industry is losing money today, and the government is asking it to pay more – whether through cuts to tax credits or through paying more in taxes.

The bill doesn’t raise oil and gas tax rates. But the changes to subsidies would have the effect of requiring companies to pay at least 4 percent in production taxes. This would begin in roughly 2020.

Members of Governor Bill Walker’s administration have raised concerns about the current version of the bill. They say it will benefit established oil producers, but not companies that are looking to start production.

Bill Armstrong, president and CEO of Armstrong Oil and Gas, also is concerned about House Bill 247. He says ending the ability of companies to receive tax credits based on net operating losses would hurt companies that want to expand into the North Slope.

“The new version of HB 247 – the nickname should be hell bent 24-7 on kicking all the new players off of the North Slope,” Armstrong said. “Because the new version of HB 247 is heavily stacked to the benefit of the three existing producers up on the North Slope.”

The committee is scheduled to hear public testimony on the bill tonight.

Andrew Kitchenman is the state government and politics reporter for Alaska Public Media and KTOO in Juneau. Reach him at akitchenman@alaskapublic.org.

Previous articleMyron Naneng Resigns As AVCP President/CEO
Next articleVeterans Affairs administrator meets with Alaska vets