Supreme Court of Alaska hears arguments over legality of Walker’s PFD veto

The Supreme Court of Alaska. (Wesley Early / Alaska Public Media)

The fate of hundreds of millions in Permanent Fund dividend money now rests with the five Alaska Supreme court judges.

Listen now

The court heard oral arguments today in Anchorage in a case that seeks to overturn Governor Bill Walkers veto last year of $666 million from the dividend. Anchorage Democratic Senator Bill Wielechowski and two former republican state lawmakers sued last November to get the money back.

“It’s critical to Alaskans and I think we should share a little bit of our oil wealth with the people,” Wielechowski said.

Lower courts ruled last year the Governor had the power to use his line item veto to take the money from dividend checks.

Today on the fifth floor of the Boney Courthouse in Downtown Anchorage, about 75 people watched as the justices heard from both sides.

State attorney Kathryn Vogel argued that the money the governor vetoed was actually an appropriation and subject to his override.

State attorney Katherine Vogel argued that the governor’s veto of the Permanent Fund dividend amounts was within his rights. (Photo by Wesley Early, Alaska Public Media – Anchorage)

“Both parties agree that the Permanent Fund Dividend is a statutory entitlement. It is not in the constitutional amendment, and that enables the governor to, when faced with funding for that in an appropriations bill, to strike or reduce,” Vogel said.

But Senator Wielechowski, a lawyer himself, disagreed, saying the original intent of the law that created the Permanent Fund Dividend program was that the money is dedicated funding and not an appropriation therefore, not subject to veto. He said the legislature has that authority and not the governor.

“We think the legislature did in fact dedicate the funding in 1980 and again in 1982 for dividends,” Wielechowski said. “And so, when you have a dedicated fund, the governor can’t veto that. It’s not subject to the appropriation process. The only way that you change that is by a future legislature changing that. So our position is, yeah the legislature can change that at any time. The legislature’s hands aren’t tied. They just have to change the law.”

Before the hearing 35 people lined up outside the courthouse to protest the governor’s veto of the PFD money, and to let lawmakers know they don’t want to see their dividend checks reduced to pay for state government. Juanita Casellius, a coordinator for the group Permanent Fund Defenders, said the decision will likely have long lasting effects on the Permanent Fund Dividend.

Protesters lined up in front of the Boney Courthouse. They were against Governor Walker’s veto of some of the Permanent Fund dividend. (Photo by Wesley Early, Alaska Public Media – Anchorage)

“This decision will open the door to raids on the Permanent Fund and the dividend if the governor is allowed to veto it,” Casellius said. “And it’ll also protect the people’s money from raids if it is prevailing for Bill Wielechowski, (Rick) Halford and (Clem)Tillion.”

It can take up to a year for the Supreme Court to decide a case. Both sides don’t think it will take that long for a decision on this case.

This story contained contributions form Henry Leasia, Wesley Early and Sean Doogan of Alaska Public Media. 

Wesley Early covers Anchorage life and city politics for Alaska Public Media. Reach him at and follow him on X at @wesley_early. Read more about Wesley here.

Previous articleConfusion over legalities is hurting Alaskan ivory market, locals say
Next articleSitka considers code changes in landslide zones