A lawsuit challenging an upcoming Matanuska-Susitna Borough ballot initiative could stall a vote on banning commercial marijuana in the Valley. Attorneys for the Borough filed a response Monday, arguing that the suit could wreak havoc with the Borough’s October fourth election.
One of two pot-related lawsuits filed earlier this month against the Matanuska-Susitna Borough alleges the Borough is asking voters to decide on a initiative regarding the ban of retail cannabis, in violation of state statutes. [ A second suit asks for an award of 1.4 million dollars in compensation for lost income due to a Borough moratorium against retail marijuana operations until the October Borough election.]
The suit also alleges election fraud. The plaintiffs have asked the court for injunctive relief.
The suit filed by Ronda Marcy and Thomas Hannam says state statutes require local land use issues to be decided by local government planning and zoning boards, and cites legal precedents upholding the state mandate for planning commission review of these types of ordinances. Mat-Su Borough *attorney* Nicholas Spiropoulos said he filed a response and a cross motion for summary judgement in the case on Monday. Spiropoulos would not go on record for this story, citing an active court case.
The Borough’s response to the suit denies all allegations that the Borough acted outside the law in putting the initiative on the upcoming ballot.
Cynthia Franklin, who heads the state’s Alcohol and Marijuana Control Office [AMCO] said although her board is neutral on the outcome, it is watching the suit closely. Franklin says the 2014 state ballot measure that legalized marijuana in Alaska allows for local governments to opt out.
The plaintiffs are representing themselves and are asking the court to force the initiative off the October 4 Borough ballot. In the 35 page suit, the plaintiffs also allege the proposed Borough initiative represents a “taking” of property, and challenge the Borough’s zoning power, while it raises questions regarding constitutional restrictions on the power of initiative.
The Borough’s response admits zoning by initiative is invalid, but denies that the Borough ballot proposition is a zoning ordinance.
The Borough also denies the plaintiffs’ allegations of election fraud. Former Mat Su Borough mayor Larry DeVilbiss [ is one of the sponsors of the citizens’ petition that got the initiative on the Borough ballot in the first place. ] and fourteen other individuals who sponsored the initiative have been named in the suit.
In a Borough response opposing the plaintiffs request for injunctive relief, Spiropoulos wrote, that, if granted: … “it will virtually destroy the Matanuska-Susitna Borough’s ability to conduct a clear and organized election. Plaintiff’s requests will jeopardize the accuracy and results of all other questions on the ballot.”
Absentee Borough ballots went out on Monday.
Spiropoulos said the Borough has complied with the court’s request for an expedited response, and has asked the court for expedited oral argument in the case.
APTI Reporter-Producer Ellen Lockyer started her radio career in the late 1980s, after a stint at bush Alaska weekly newspapers, the Copper Valley Views and the Cordova Times. When the Exxon Valdez ran aground in Prince William Sound, Valdez Public Radio station KCHU needed a reporter, and Ellen picked up the microphone.
Since then, she has literally traveled the length of the state, from Attu to Eagle and from Barrow to Juneau, covering Alaska stories on the ground for the AK show, Alaska News Nightly, the Alaska Morning News and for Anchorage public radio station, KSKA
elockyer (at) alaskapublic (dot) org | 907.550.8446 | About Ellen
